The Edge of Heaven
Charlie Dunn
Discuss this article
Recently I sat down with a friend who believed a great many Christian truths. He believed it was impossible to live with a deterministic worldview, and he valued free will and the uniqueness of humanity. Though he saw the broken and materialistic state of our world, he recognized that man could find purpose and value in life when reconciled with his Creator. Yet there was one concept that he could not seem to accept: Hell. How could God be so unmerciful as to send people to Hell? Would God really send “good” people of other faiths to Hell? How could the God of love be so wrathful as to send people to eternal torture? His questions were thoughtful and provocative. Indeed these same questions challenge Christians and non-Christians alike. Men and women more learned than I have poured many hours into attempting to answer these questions. Even so, I will try to articulate my responses to them.
At the heart of the discussion about Hell is the concept of sin. Traditionally, society, both Christian and non-Christian, has equated sin with immoral actions such as lying, lusting, or stealing, actions for which perpetrators are condemned to hell. But to define sin in such a way is to merely address the symptoms of what sin truly is and not to diagnose the fundamental nature of sin or its roots.
Sin is not simply immoral actions, but rather these actions are manifest symptoms of the deeper issue, which truly defines sin: separation from God. Sin is a state of being, existing outside of God’s will and residing apart from Him. At the root of all sin is pride, which is essentially the idea that we can control our lives without God and that He is irrelevant to us. Sin is, whether consciously or not, shaking our fists at God and saying that we do not need Him. It is positing that we the created understand how to conduct and order our lives better than the Creator. Whether it is ourselves, or something in our lives, we worship whatever is most valuable to us, making it our god. And God, not being tyrannical or compulsory, does not force us to worship Him, but rather allows us to worship whatever and whomever we choose.
In C.S. Lewis’ book The Great Divorce, Lewis questions whether or not many people in Hell would choose Heaven even if they could. Lewis illustrates a bus full of people from Hell who arrive at the edge of Heaven, where they are implored to abandon the things that have imprisoned them in Hell. Whether bound by addiction, resentment, self-pity, or hatred, the people cannot seem to let go of their problems despite their misery. They are unable to take responsibility for their actions, and thus they reject the prospect of Heaven before them. Lewis elsewhere discusses the concept that hearts separated from God can reach such a point of depravity, that they would not want to be in Heaven even if they could. He writes:
Hell … begins with a grumbling mood, and yourself still distinct from it: perhaps even criticizing it…. You can repent and come out of it again. But there may come a day when you can do that no longer. Then there will be no you left to criticize the mood or even enjoy it, but just the grumble itself going on forever like a machine. 1Though a daunting and frightening prospect, it is not unthinkable to imagine people holding onto things, despite the fact that giving them up would be for their greatest good. Lewis writes:
There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, ‘Thy will be done,’ and those to whom God says, in the end, ‘Thy will be done.’ No soul that seriously and constantly desires joy will ever miss it. Those who seek find. To those who knock it is opened.2Christian thinker Tim Keller notes that according to Romans 1:21-25, we were made to live for God, but often we live for work, love, morality, and achievement, looking to them for worth and meaning. We become enslaved to these things, and the “guilt, anger, and fear” which they produce are “like fire that destroys us.” 3 Hell is not simply God finding ways to punish people who do not obey Him. Rather, as Lewis describes it, people would rather have their perceived freedom than salvation. Those who arrive at the edge of Heaven in The Great Divorce, refuse to glorify God and submit to him for fear that in doing so they might lose their human greatness. Ironically, that is exactly what their choice has done. They have lost the very greatness for which they were created. “There is always something they insist on keeping even at the price of misery. There is always something they prefer to joy – that is to reality…it has a hundred fine names – Achilles’ wrath and Corialanus’ grandeur, Revenge and Injured Merit and Self-Respect and Tragic Greatness and Proper Pride.” 4
This past summer, I spent some time fishing with one of my uncles. It was a great time for me to leave behind my urban ways and experience the serenity of nature. While out on the lake, my uncle shared with me many of his life experiences, and we talked about the things that were most valuable to us. When the conversation focused on the Christian faith, my uncle brought up a heartfelt concern, which I have heard expressed by many other friends. While he considered following Jesus the best way for him, he could not believe that God would send a devout Muslim, Hindu, or Buddhist to hell. After all, throughout his medical career he had known several very good men and women who espoused these faiths. To my uncle and to many others, to see God as accepting good people of all faiths into heaven is far more tolerant and inclusive.
In many of the world’s major religions, there seems to be the idea that if we are “good” enough people, we can merit the favor of God. According to former Muslim and now Christian lecturer Afshin Ziafat,5 Muslims believe that people’s deeds are weighed, and if they are good enough, they might tip the scale, allowing them to be admitted into paradise. Essentially, the good people are able to find God but the bad do not. But what about us not so good people? The Gospel says that “the people who know they aren’t good can find God, and the people who think they are good do not.” 6 It proclaims that no matter who you are or what you have done, you can still be reconciled to God through accepting the gift of Jesus Christ. This concept is illustrated in the gospel of Matthew, where Jesus is confronted by a man with leprosy. Scorned and repelled by his society, this leper was separated from all human contact. He knelt before Jesus and said “Lord, if you are willing, you can make me clean.” Having heard his request, “Jesus reached out his hand and touched the man. ‘I am willing’ he said. ‘Be clean!’ Immediately he was cured of his leprosy.” 7 In this amazing story we see the heart of the Gospel. Christ reached out and touched humanity while we were still in the depths of sin.
One of the greatest objections to the concept of Hell that I have encountered is this: if God is loving, how could He send people into eternal torture? How could He construct ways to make people suffer? To address these questions, it is beneficial to consider the Augustinian definition of evil. He states, “Evil has no positive nature; but the loss of good has received the name ‘evil’.” 8 One might compare his analysis with light or heat, which empirically exist, and darkness and cold, which are merely the absence of light or heat. In the same way, God exists, but evil as an independent entity does not. Evil is fundamentally the absence of God. Thus what makes Hell such a torturous place is not a little devil poking people with a pitchfork, nor is it Homer Simpson’s Hell, a mountain of donuts that he is forced to consume. Hell is torturous because it is eternal separation from God, Who according to the Bible is the source of all joy, love, wisdom, and all things good.9 Imagine a place devoid of everything in which we delight, everything that we value or cherish, and you will begin to glimpse the darkness of hell. Surely, Hell is a real place, which the Bible often describes with imagery of fire, 10 yet what makes Hell so unbearable is the separation from all things good; separation from God.
In her book Hope Has Its Reasons, Becky Pippert describes how any loving person is often filled with wrath. She writes:
Think how we feel when we see someone we love ravaged by unwise actions or relationships. Do we respond with benign tolerance as we might toward strangers? Far from it…. Anger isn’t the opposite of love. Hate is, and the final form of hate is indifference. 11God as loving as He is, despite the fact that we shook our fists at Him, despite the fact that we found other things to worship and deemed Him irrelevant to our lives, refused to “indifferently” allow us to spend eternity separated from Him. Thus He sent His only son to earth to be born a man, to endure what we endure, and to experience what we experience. Being fully God and yet fully man, He lived a perfect life, and when His time had come, He took all of our sins upon Himself and died on a cross. Three days later, He was resurrected as He had predicted, now interceding with God on our behalf.
Jesus showed us what true love really means. John 15:15 says, “Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends,” 12 and indeed that is the love that God sent to the world through Christ. Romans 3:23 states: “All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” 13 We cannot attain salvation on our own merit; salvation is the amazing gift of God’s grace, and all we must do is accept it in faith. “For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life.” 14 Perhaps the best answer I could have given my friend – certainly the best answer to my own doubts and questions – is that maybe we need to be asking a more poignant question. In light of God’s grace, rather than asking how God could send people to Hell, we might consider asking: why haven’t I accepted God’s great gift?
1. C.S. Lewis, The Great Divorce (New York: Harper Collins, 2001) 77.
2. Ibid., 75.
3. Tim Keller, “Preaching Hell in a Tolerant Age,” Christianity Today International/Leadership Journal 18 (1997): 42.
4. C.S. Lewis, 71-2.
5. Afshin Ziafat, Afshin Ziafat Ministries.
6. Tim Keller, 42.
7. Matthew 8:2-3. The NIV Study Bible, ed. Kenneth Barker et al. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1995).
8. Augustine, The City of God, tr. and ed. Marcus Dods (New York: Hafner, 1948) XI, Chap. 9.
9. Psalm 16:11, James 1:17. The NIV Study Bible.
10. James 3:6, Revelation 21:8. Ibid.
11. Becky Pippert, Hope Has Its Reasons (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2001) 101.
12. John 15:15. The NIV Study Bible.
13. Romans 3:23. NIV.
14. Romans 6:23. NIV.

DS on Sun May 06 03:49:22 +0000 2007
Great article. I think this takes a difficult concept, makes it personal and real, and it brings us back to the truth of the gospel in a coherent, intellectually true way.